<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Occam's Razor &#187; Епистемология и логика</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bgchaos.com/category/polemics/logic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bgchaos.com</link>
	<description>Mathematics in Nature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2018 11:50:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Тест за псевдонаучност</title>
		<link>http://bgchaos.com/en/842/polemics/logic/%d1%82%d0%b5%d1%81%d1%82-%d0%b7%d0%b0-%d0%bf%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%b2%d0%b4%d0%be%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d1%87%d0%bd%d0%be%d1%81%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d1%87%d0%bd%d0%be-%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bf%d1%83/</link>
		<comments>http://bgchaos.com/en/842/polemics/logic/%d1%82%d0%b5%d1%81%d1%82-%d0%b7%d0%b0-%d0%bf%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%b2%d0%b4%d0%be%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d1%87%d0%bd%d0%be%d1%81%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d1%87%d0%bd%d0%be-%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bf%d1%83/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanya]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Епистемология и логика]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bgchaos.com/?p=842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Демокрацията, всеобщото право на гласуване, равнопоставеноста на всеки глас заблуди много хора, че всеки има право на мнение за космоса, живота и всичко останало &#8211; от ГМО до Големия адронен колайдер. И че това тяхно мнение има еднаква тежест с мнението на нещастния професор, който е &#8220;загубил&#8221; с тези въпроси десетилетия. Изобилието, достъпността и свободата [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bgchaos.com/en/842/polemics/logic/%d1%82%d0%b5%d1%81%d1%82-%d0%b7%d0%b0-%d0%bf%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%b2%d0%b4%d0%be%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d1%87%d0%bd%d0%be%d1%81%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d1%87%d0%bd%d0%be-%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bf%d1%83/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Тест за псевдонаучност/научност на статия</title>
		<link>http://bgchaos.com/en/840/polemics/logic/test/</link>
		<comments>http://bgchaos.com/en/840/polemics/logic/test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2014 13:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanya]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Епистемология и логика]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bgchaos.com/?p=840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[В Демаркационната линия между наука и не-наука и в Методите на науката вече съм писала за основните критерии, определящи границата наука/псевдонаука, но един тест винаги има своите предимства. Този тест може да послужи за проверка дали хипотеза, теория или просто някаква идея, които претендират за научност, не са всъщност &#8220;псевдо&#8221; , да ви помогне да [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bgchaos.com/en/840/polemics/logic/test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Български) Методите на науката</title>
		<link>http://bgchaos.com/en/736/polemics/logic/%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d0%ba%d0%b0-%d1%81%d1%80%d0%b5%d1%89%d1%83-%d0%bf%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%b2%d0%b4%d0%be%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d0%ba%d0%b0-%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d1%87%d0%b5%d0%bd-%d0%bc%d0%b5%d1%82%d0%be%d0%b4/</link>
		<comments>http://bgchaos.com/en/736/polemics/logic/%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d0%ba%d0%b0-%d1%81%d1%80%d0%b5%d1%89%d1%83-%d0%bf%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%b2%d0%b4%d0%be%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d0%ba%d0%b0-%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d1%87%d0%b5%d0%bd-%d0%bc%d0%b5%d1%82%d0%be%d0%b4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanya]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Епистемология и логика]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[епистемология]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[научен метод]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Попър]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bgchaos.com/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, this entry is only available in Български.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bgchaos.com/en/736/polemics/logic/%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d0%ba%d0%b0-%d1%81%d1%80%d0%b5%d1%89%d1%83-%d0%bf%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%b2%d0%b4%d0%be%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d0%ba%d0%b0-%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d1%87%d0%b5%d0%bd-%d0%bc%d0%b5%d1%82%d0%be%d0%b4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Demarcation problem between science and non-science</title>
		<link>http://bgchaos.com/en/740/polemics/logic/%d0%b4%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b0%d1%80%d0%ba%d0%b0%d1%86%d0%b8%d0%be%d0%bd%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%82%d0%b0-%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%b8%d1%8f-%d0%bc%d0%b5%d0%b6%d0%b4%d1%83-%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d0%ba%d0%b0-%d0%b8-%d0%bd/</link>
		<comments>http://bgchaos.com/en/740/polemics/logic/%d0%b4%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b0%d1%80%d0%ba%d0%b0%d1%86%d0%b8%d0%be%d0%bd%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%82%d0%b0-%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%b8%d1%8f-%d0%bc%d0%b5%d0%b6%d0%b4%d1%83-%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d0%ba%d0%b0-%d0%b8-%d0%bd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 22:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanya]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Епистемология и логика]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[епистемология]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[научен метод]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ненаука]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Попър]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bgchaos.com/?p=740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, this entry is only available in Български.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bgchaos.com/en/740/polemics/logic/%d0%b4%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b0%d1%80%d0%ba%d0%b0%d1%86%d0%b8%d0%be%d0%bd%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%82%d0%b0-%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%b8%d1%8f-%d0%bc%d0%b5%d0%b6%d0%b4%d1%83-%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d0%ba%d0%b0-%d0%b8-%d0%bd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Теории за произхода на религията. Наука или религия. Комунизмът като религия</title>
		<link>http://bgchaos.com/en/749/polemics/logic/%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d0%ba%d0%b0-%d0%b8%d0%bb%d0%b8-%d1%80%d0%b5%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%b3%d0%b8%d1%8f/</link>
		<comments>http://bgchaos.com/en/749/polemics/logic/%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d0%ba%d0%b0-%d0%b8%d0%bb%d0%b8-%d1%80%d0%b5%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%b3%d0%b8%d1%8f/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 21:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanya]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Епистемология и логика]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[медитация]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[научен метод]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[религия]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bgchaos.com/?p=749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Сложните взаимоотношения между наука и религия, ще започна с малък опит да систематизирам възгледи и теории за произхода на религията. Защо се е появила религията? Кратък исторически преглед на проблема Древна Гърция Опитите за обяснение на произхода на религията са започнали още в Древна Гърция. На Ксенофан принадлежи мисълта, че боговете са създадени по образ [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bgchaos.com/en/749/polemics/logic/%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%83%d0%ba%d0%b0-%d0%b8%d0%bb%d0%b8-%d1%80%d0%b5%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%b3%d0%b8%d1%8f/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital thinking and polynomial Zhegalkin &#8211; part 1</title>
		<link>http://bgchaos.com/en/521/polemics/logic/%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b3%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b0%d0%bb%d0%bd%d0%be%d1%82%d0%be-%d0%bc%d0%b8%d1%81%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b5-%d0%b8-%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%bc%d1%8a%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%b6%d0%b5/</link>
		<comments>http://bgchaos.com/en/521/polemics/logic/%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b3%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b0%d0%bb%d0%bd%d0%be%d1%82%d0%be-%d0%bc%d0%b8%d1%81%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b5-%d0%b8-%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%bc%d1%8a%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%b6%d0%b5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanya]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Епистемология и логика]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bgchaos.com/?p=521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, this entry is only available in Български.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bgchaos.com/en/521/polemics/logic/%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b3%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b0%d0%bb%d0%bd%d0%be%d1%82%d0%be-%d0%bc%d0%b8%d1%81%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b5-%d0%b8-%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%bc%d1%8a%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%b6%d0%b5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital thinking and polynomial Zhegalkin &#8211; part 2</title>
		<link>http://bgchaos.com/en/522/polemics/logic/%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b3%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b0%d0%bb%d0%bd%d0%be%d1%82%d0%be-%d0%bc%d0%b8%d1%81%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b5-%d0%b8-%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%bc%d1%8a%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%b6%d0%b5-2/</link>
		<comments>http://bgchaos.com/en/522/polemics/logic/%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b3%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b0%d0%bb%d0%bd%d0%be%d1%82%d0%be-%d0%bc%d0%b8%d1%81%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b5-%d0%b8-%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%bc%d1%8a%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%b6%d0%b5-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanya]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Епистемология и логика]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bgchaos.com/?p=522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, this entry is only available in Български.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bgchaos.com/en/522/polemics/logic/%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b3%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b0%d0%bb%d0%bd%d0%be%d1%82%d0%be-%d0%bc%d0%b8%d1%81%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b5-%d0%b8-%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%bc%d1%8a%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%b6%d0%b5-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital thinking and polynomial Zhegalkin &#8211; part 3</title>
		<link>http://bgchaos.com/en/524/polemics/logic/%d0%ba%d0%b0%d1%80%d1%82%d0%b8-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%ba%d0%b0%d1%80%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%b2%d0%b5%d0%b9%d1%87-%d1%87%d0%b0%d1%81%d1%82-3/</link>
		<comments>http://bgchaos.com/en/524/polemics/logic/%d0%ba%d0%b0%d1%80%d1%82%d0%b8-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%ba%d0%b0%d1%80%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%b2%d0%b5%d0%b9%d1%87-%d1%87%d0%b0%d1%81%d1%82-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanya]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Епистемология и логика]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bgchaos.com/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, this entry is only available in Български.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bgchaos.com/en/524/polemics/logic/%d0%ba%d0%b0%d1%80%d1%82%d0%b8-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%ba%d0%b0%d1%80%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%b2%d0%b5%d0%b9%d1%87-%d1%87%d0%b0%d1%81%d1%82-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital thinking and polynomial Zhegalkin &#8211; part 4</title>
		<link>http://bgchaos.com/en/523/polemics/logic/%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b3%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b0%d0%bb%d0%bd%d0%be%d1%82%d0%be-%d0%bc%d0%b8%d1%81%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b5-%d0%b8-%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%bc%d1%8a%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%b6%d0%b5-3/</link>
		<comments>http://bgchaos.com/en/523/polemics/logic/%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b3%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b0%d0%bb%d0%bd%d0%be%d1%82%d0%be-%d0%bc%d0%b8%d1%81%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b5-%d0%b8-%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%bc%d1%8a%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%b6%d0%b5-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanya]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Епистемология и логика]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bgchaos.com/?p=523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, this entry is only available in Български.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bgchaos.com/en/523/polemics/logic/%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b3%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b0%d0%bb%d0%bd%d0%be%d1%82%d0%be-%d0%bc%d0%b8%d1%81%d0%bb%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b5-%d0%b8-%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%be%d0%bc%d1%8a%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%b6%d0%b5-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occam&#8217;s razor</title>
		<link>http://bgchaos.com/en/525/polemics/logic/%d0%b1%d1%80%d1%8a%d1%81%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%87%d1%8a%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%be%d0%ba%d0%b0%d0%bc/</link>
		<comments>http://bgchaos.com/en/525/polemics/logic/%d0%b1%d1%80%d1%8a%d1%81%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%87%d1%8a%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%be%d0%ba%d0%b0%d0%bc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanya]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Епистемология и логика]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bgchaos.com/?p=525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, this entry is only available in Български.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bgchaos.com/en/525/polemics/logic/%d0%b1%d1%80%d1%8a%d1%81%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%87%d1%8a%d1%82-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%be%d0%ba%d0%b0%d0%bc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
